Weizhen Tang Corporation

Username
Password

Arguments for Trading：

Author:ÌÆì¿Õé Date:2010-07-16 11:41:00 Readers:176 reads

Summary

For the OSC Hearing of Nov 13，2009

Arguments：

According to the regulations of the OSC, 90% of those who are capable of creating profits in the market are not eligible for registration.
90% of those who have made the registration with the OSC in accordance to its regulations are eventually washed out in the market.
The OSC has murdered the trade of investment brokerage, caused so much harm to the investors, and put itself on the route to disaster.
Regulation has to change and must change, only I know how.

It’s time investors mastered their own affairs.
The OSC’s cease trader order against Weizhen Tang is a grave mistake that must be rectified immediately.
In 1994, Weizhen Tang passed the Canadian Securities Examination.

In 1998, Weizhen Tang passed the exam once again, and applied twice for the PDO exam, which failed him due to lack of objective standards.

Weizhen Tang has fifteen years of extensive market experience in North America.

For fifteen years, he has committed himself to developing strategies of continuous and steady investment returns without loss.

In 1995, Tang successfully achieved consistent profits in his mutual fund speculations, where he was able to keep up to a hundred accounts loss free for one year. His yearly return rate reached 30-50%, and fund under his management grew from $4,000 (Canadian) to 4 million with a year. Unfortunately Tang couldn’t continue his operation due to new restrictions enforced by the OSC.
From 1997- 1998 , Tang’s fund for Forex trading from USD $4,000 to $46,000.

In 2005, Tang introduced his goal of one percent weekly return, his theory and approaches.

In 2008, Tang successfully avoided losses, which was a truly amazing achievement considering the fact that 90% of the funds, whether it’s mutual fund or hedge fund, have lost at least 50% in value in the global financial storms. Most stocks devalued even more.

Listed below are a few examples of winning, which fund managers and general investors are never able to accomplish.

In 9 days from January 22 to 31, Tang made a continuous profit of 600%.

In early 2008, under the supervision of two of partners, Tang achieved amazing performances: his funds grew from 279,772.62 of January 22 to $37,8296.68 on January 23, to $650,819.83 on January 24, to $715,075.85 on January 25.

After the weekend, his fund rose to $872902.05 on January 28, to $970690.52 on January 29, to $ 1,198,688.77 on January 30, and to $1499557.57 on January 31. It finally skyrocketed to $ 1902345.51 on February 1.

Tang has another record of consistent winning of 300%.
Starting from $97,182.45 on July 14, his fund rose to $105,488.99 on July 15, then to $169,235.11 on July 16, then to $231,491.39 on July 17, then to $228,128.01 on July 18. By July 22, the fund had grown to $292,664.53.

Another consistent win happened in July of 2008, when Tang grew a fund of $97,182.45 on July 14 to $105,488.99 on July 15, to $169,235.11 on July 16, to $231,491.39 on July 17, to $228,128.01 on July 18, and finally to $292,664.53 on July 22.

In November of 2008, Tang turned $5,000 to more than $110,000 through operations, which enabled him to discover a better strategy for risk control， not windfall profit.

Tang’s strategy and practice of consistent profit generation in 2009

From January 11 to February 26, Tang made a profit of $5 million, using a capital of $1 million, his weekly return averaging $1 million. Before the incident broke out, Tang made investing operations on a personal account of an investor under investors’ close watch and tremendous pressure. He successfully achieved reliable and consistent returns, out of which $ 1 million was transferred to the Oversea Chinese Partnership Fund.

From January 26 to 31, Tang made a five-day public demo of his trading operations. Despite of the media and investors’ attention on him, he made a profit of $490,000 (49%) in the first three days. However, due to stress, fatigue, lack of reserve fund, and the position of personal investor, he eventually lost the profits to the market and failed to attain the profit target of one percent weekly. Despite of the filed endeavour, the public demonstration is unprecedented, a good showcase of his courage and strength.

From March 16 to 18, Tang’s operations under the close watch of all investors brought an increase of 20% profit within 3 days, his fund growing from $350,000 to $440,000, net profit being $90,000.

By January 11, 2009, Tang managed to put together $1 million and successfully grew it to $5 million after one month of effective operations and co-operation. Unfortunately, the unsuccessful 100% weekly demo and the fear of the investors gave rise to another wave of panic withdrawals, which ended in some clients filing a report to the police and the OSC, which issued a suspension on Tang’s trading permit. Even just a few days before his trading was ordered to stop, Tang was still making profits daily and grew 25% of the funds in one week under extreme conditions. Though not comprehensive, the above record is sufficient to show that Tang is not a pursuer of colossal profits, but one who seeks consistent 1% weekly returns. The remarkable growth of his funds is a perfect showcase of his market and investing ability.

From September 4 to October 30, growing from $1 million to $3.2 million (due to the cease trade order of the OSC, Tang used a foreign exchange virtual account to conduct a trading demo for investors)
From 2006 to 2008， Tang raised a fund of $60 million through live demonstration of his Forex investing skills.

In year one (2006), Tang sustained loss in stock investments and failed to maintain consistent returns.
In year two (2007), Tang sustained loss in stock and index futures investments and stop future loss forever.
In year three (2008), Tang avoided loss in Forex and futures investments in the mass and effectively controlled risks.

In year four (2009), Tang achieved continuous and consistent profits in Forex trading. With risks under control, he put the focus on fluctuation frequency and range.

Through 15 years of persistent struggle and practice, Tang has acquired real skills and high proficiency in wealth creation in the financial market. Should he be deprived of the chance to stand up again for just a one-time mistake made?

Once registered with the OSC, fund managers don’t take moral or legal responsibilities for losses incurred in their operations. In my opinion, registration functions as a license for murdering the investors. I did not register with the OSC because I don’t want to harm the investors. Most of those who have registered with the OSC conduct passive investments for the sake of avoiding conflicts and trouble.

Weizhen Tang’s investment strategies, which are dynamic in nature, aim at specific targets and take advantage of his reliable methods and experience. With risks effectively under control, they are subject to much less risk as compared to conventional investments, but much more promising for high investment returns.

It takes at lease fifteen years for someone to acquire the same level of competence and proficiency as Weizhen Tang. For others, it might be impossible at all. The majority of fund managers never thought of doing the same thing, let alone put it in practice. For Weizhen Tang, temporary loss and frustration will not be turned into permanent failures.

URL

Send it to friend, input friend's name: Email Address: